Compulsory Sterilisation for all Hippycrites

Hippies make me mad. Hippies make me sick. They should be rounded up into concentration camps and shot like the walking pig-fucking abortions that they are.

This is not because hippies smell. This is not even because hippies have a different worldview to myself - on the contrary, I think everyone wants an end to war and world hunger. But hippies are stupid, and I cannot abide stupidity. They think they can accomplish these goals by supporting the very institutions which perpetuate war and poverty. For this, they deserve crucifixion. Fucking hypocrites.

On one front there's the whole "Stop the War" fanatics. Well sorry, hippies, but they don't want to. They're killing innocent people and oppressing women. Hippies would rather that the Taliban stayed right where they are, because otherwise that would mean white people (shock! horror!) killing darkies, which would be racist and bad. They would rather the darkies did their own killing than have "racism" on their own consciences. Hypocrites! They think you can reason with such people. And suddenly, the Northern Alliance is their worst enemy for killing a few hundred Pakis in a school. Well newsflash! hippies, those Pakis would have given their eye teeth to have your white arses dead, but then I suppose that's only because of poverty, colonialisation, and globalisation. "Please kill me, I feel your pain." Duh.

Then there's the anti-globalisation brigade. I won't even mention the fact that these wankers have no concrete alternative to the capitalist world they so vehemently loathe. Oops, I did anyway. But this lot don't even think. Yes, it's obvious that globalisation is perpetuated by multinationals in the search for fresh markets and more money. Even a child can work that out. They mention the "exploitation" of cheap labour in the third world. What they don't ask is "what would these people be doing otherwise?" The answer is: something less lucrative. Somebody please explain to me how employing Indonesians to make shoes makes them poorer than they were before? The answer is that it doesn't. It's the same logic that says I deserve £7 an hour for my job in the UK, but you would be mad to pay me $24 an hour to pack library books into a crate in NZ. But if you employ more people in poorer countries for lower wages, not only does that make you rich, but it injects investment into an economy that wouldn't otherwise have it. It makes the poor economy a little bit richer, which... er... is good, right? You hippie retards still with me, or is this a little too complex for your stunted brain stems?!

But what of the workers in the rich economy who are out of a job? Well, in global terms, there's no more unemployment than there was before, in fact, it's likely to be less. Why should those people be employed at the expense of the darkies? Because they're WHITE?!!!! Oh dear, those hippies have got themselves into a moral dilemma now!

The loony left, the hippies, whatever you like to call them have no defence. They claim to be enlightened liberals. Some of them even have degrees. But basically, all they want to do is build a fence around the rich whites of the world, and hoard the gold within, something I'd have no problem accepting if they didn't claim the exact opposite aims.

- Cartman